03/06/2026
One thing that has always deeply unsettled me when conversations about circumcision come up is how quickly the discussion turns to s*x.
I’ve heard people say that if a boy isn’t circumcised, women won’t want to sleep with him someday.
And every time I hear that, I pause and think:
Why are we talking about the future s*x life of a newborn?
Why are we comfortable s*xualizing a baby’s body in order to justify altering it?
As someone who hopes to become a parent one day, this is something I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about.
And for me, the values are simple: bodily autonomy, informed consent, and respect for the wholeness of a child’s body.
Routine infant circumcision is often framed as a medical necessity, but the reality is that there is no urgent health requirement for it in healthy newborns. For many families, it is ultimately a cosmetic or cultural decision.
For me personally, the idea of altering a baby’s body based on hypothetical future s*xual preferences feels deeply uncomfortable.
A child’s body should never be shaped around the imagined desires of future partners.
If my future son ever decides as an adult that he wants to make a different choice about his own body, that decision will belong to him — when he is old enough to understand it and consent to it.
But babies deserve the dignity of being born whole without their bodies immediately becoming the subject of adult s*xual conversations.
Choosing bodily autonomy for our children shouldn’t be controversial.
And honestly, the most uncomfortable part of this conversation will never be an intact baby.
It will always be the moment adults start discussing a newborn’s future s*x life.