31/12/2025
Hmmm
A New York attorney is challenging the IRS definition of family, and she is doing it with her dog at her side. Amanda Reynolds has filed a lawsuit against the IRS on behalf of herself and her eight year old Golden Retriever, Finnegan Mary Reynolds, arguing that pets should qualify as dependents for tax purposes. The case seeks recognition of the financial realities faced by pet parents and could open access to certain tax benefits.
Currently, the IRS categorizes pets as property. Reynolds argues that pets meet nearly all dependency standards outlined in the tax code, noting that they earn no income, live full time with their caregivers, and often require more than $5,000 a year in care. She says labeling pets as property ignores their role within families and describes Finnegan as “for all intents and purposes” her daughter.
Reynolds also points out that service animals already receive certain tax considerations. She argues that there is no real financial distinction between caring for a service animal and a companion animal, making the existing rules inconsistent and unfair.
In her lawsuit, Reynolds cites the Equal Protection Clause and the Takings Clause, claiming that denying tax recognition to nonhuman dependents violates principles of fairness under the law. She proposes that pets be treated as “quasi citizens” with limited civil recognition, including eligibility as dependents.
The case has encountered resistance. Judge James M. Wick has paused discovery after the IRS presented arguments suggesting the lawsuit is likely to be dismissed. Despite this, Reynolds remains hopeful, describing the case as a labor of love and saying Finnegan is her child in every way that matters.
No matter the outcome, the lawsuit reflects a growing call for laws to better reflect how people view their pets today. References: Forbes - Lawyer Sues The IRS, Demanding It Recognize Pets As Legal Dependents
