Global Emergency Medical Registry

Global Emergency Medical Registry The Global Emergency Medical Registry is a general member of the Association of Accredited Certification Bodies.

The Global Registry was formed to standardize medical professionals in hospital and prehospital environments for specialized activities across the international landscape. The original guidance for the organization coming from GEMR advisory members and organizations that have been intimately involved as or in certifying bodies since 1987. Membership in the AACB demonstrates a commitment to abiding by the legal and ethical requirements of membership and denotes a commitment to being relevant in the industry. In 2017, the international standards for a variety of medical provider types were updated and began implementation in many parts of the world. GEMR, responding to our accreditation mandates internationally, began a corporate restructuring to meet these new requirements and demonstrate compliance with these new standards. GEMR came to the realization, in working with various stakeholders and countries around the world, that an international third-party competency confirmation process was necessary to move forward the goals of competency improvement in the prehospital and hospital occupational categories worldwide. This effort became the Global Emergency Medical Registry – GEMR. In conjunction with this, it became clear that hospital and prehospital entities were struggling with the process of privileging, or credentialing, medical professionals in the hospital and prehospital environment for specialized activities. Examples of this issue are numerous, but two such examples are pertinent to GEMR certification; the first is the issue of how to privilege personnel for basic ultrasound skills. In the prehospital and hospital environment, taking a class in ultrasound does not confirm a “credential” in ultrasound and classes have varying levels of focus and length, thus GEMR developed the Emergency Ultrasound Endorsement, to provide a third party review through testing and skills verification, of a medical professionals ability to perform specific basic ultrasound skills. A second example relates to medical personnel such as paramedic, nurses, general practice physicians, and assistants who are tasked with resuscitation duties or advanced resuscitative intervention in peri-arrest and arrest patients; through the development of the Advanced Practice Paramedic and Resuscitation Officer levels, it provides medical directors and employers the ability to privilege personnel for the complex and advanced task of resuscitation at the highest standards of science recommendations in resuscitation medicine.

SHOULD PARAMEDICS BE FOCUSED ON DEGREE PATHWAYS OR COMPETENCY PATHWAYS? – Michael Christiehttps://www.gemr.org/blog/39/s...
12/19/2025

SHOULD PARAMEDICS BE FOCUSED ON DEGREE PATHWAYS OR COMPETENCY PATHWAYS? – Michael Christie

https://www.gemr.org/blog/39/should-paramedics-be-focused-on-degree-pathways-or-competency-pathways/

There is a quiet dignity in work done well. It lives in the steady hands that repair a bridge before it fails, in the practiced judgment of a craftsperson who knows the material not from theory alone, but from years of disciplined experience. And it lives every day, often unseen, in the work of paramedics who step into moments of chaos and make order out of crisis, who meet people not at their best, but at their most vulnerable.

For too long, we have framed the value of our professions almost exclusively through the language of degrees and credentials. Education matters. Knowledge matters. But the mistake we make is assuming that formal academic pathways are the only, or even the primary, measure of professional worth. In emergency medical services, that assumption risks pulling us away from what has always made paramedicine effective: mastery of a demanding trade, earned through repetition, mentorship, accountability, and service through the reality of being the physician medical director’s hand, eyes, and ears at the moment of crisis.

Paramedics are not simply students passing through a curriculum. They are practitioners of a high-risk, high-consequence craft. They work in uncontrolled environments, with limited information, under immense time pressure. Their classroom is often a roadside at midnight, a cramped apartment, a factory floor, or a school hallway. And the lessons they carry forward are written not just in textbooks, but in muscle memory, clinical intuition, and hard-earned judgment.

This is why paramedics should proudly see themselves as journeymen and master tradespeople, professionals whose authority comes not from the number of letters after their name, but from the depth of their competence. In every mature trade, there is a clear understanding: apprenticeship builds foundations, journeymanship builds reliability, and mastery brings wisdom. Paramedicine fits this model not by accident, but by necessity.

The public does not call 911 because they want an academic debate. They call it because someone cannot breathe, because a heart has stopped, or because a body has been broken by trauma or illness. In those moments, what matters is not whether a clinician has completed a seminar, but whether they can recognize subtle signs, execute critical interventions, and adapt their physician’s direction of care, when the situation refuses to follow the script. That kind of performance is the hallmark of a master practitioner.

This does not diminish the role of physicians. On the contrary, paramedics function best as extensions of physician-led care, trusted professionals operating under delegated authority, guided by physician medical direction, and aligned with a shared clinical mission. In that relationship, the strength of the system depends on clarity of roles. Physicians bring diagnostic breadth, extreme levels of knowledge, and medical oversight. Paramedics bring immediate action, procedural expertise, and situational command by applying the medical guidelines provided to them by physicians. Each relies on the other. Neither is well served by blurring that partnership into an academic arms race.

When we push paramedics to chase degrees for status rather than skill, we risk undermining the very pipeline that produces excellence. We risk telling experienced clinicians that their years of service count less than a credential earned at a distance from the street. And most dire, we risk creating a workforce more focused on upward mobility than on mastery of the craft itself.

There is honor in staying always ready to intervene. Honor in becoming the person others turn to when the call is complex, when the patient is unstable, when the junior provider needs guidance. Trades survive because masters choose to remain in the field, passing down standards, habits, and judgment. Paramedicine is no different. Its future depends on clinicians who see longevity not as stagnation, but as stewardship and their intimate relationship with their physician medical director, not as a hindrance, but as a valuable relationship of the highest level.

None of this is an argument against learning. Paramedics must continue to study, to train, to evolve alongside medical science and under the guidance of physicians. But education should serve practice, not replace it. Continuing education rooted in clinical relevance, simulation, mentorship, and case review strengthens the trade. Education pursued solely for professional legitimacy risks disconnecting clinicians from the realities that define their value.

At its best, paramedicine is a discipline of resolve. It asks people to show up, again and again, to do difficult work with precision and restraint. It asks them to carry responsibility without applause, to make decisions that cannot be undone, and to accept outcomes that are not always just. That is not the work of a transient profession. It is the work of a mastery trade, worthy of pride.

So let us speak plainly about who paramedics are. They are not incomplete versions of other clinicians. They are not waiting to become something else. They are highly trained practitioners with thousands of hours of training, whose expertise lives at the intersection of medicine, logistics, and human crisis. Their authority is earned in the field, their credibility forged through performance, and their professionalism proven when it matters most.

If we want better emergency care, we should invest not only in pathways upward, but in pathways deeper, deeper skill, deeper experience, deeper trust. We should celebrate the journeyman who knows the system inside and out, and the master who has seen enough to remain calm when others cannot. We should build a culture that rewards excellence where it is most needed: at the patient’s side.

In doing so, we affirm something larger than titles or degrees. We affirm the value of work done with purpose, of mastery earned through service, and of professionals who understand that saving lives is not an abstraction, it is a craft. And like all great crafts, it deserves respect, rigor, and pride.

When we push paramedics to chase degrees for status rather than skill, we risk undermining the very pipeline that produces excellence. We risk telling experienced clinicians that their years of service count less than a credential earned at a distance from the street.

12/14/2025

IS MECHANICAL CPR BETTER THAN MANUAL CPR?
– Michael Christie

https://www.gemr.org/blog/35/is-mechanical-cpr-better-than-manual-cpr/

The effectiveness of mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) compared to manual compressions in cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has been the subject of extensive research. The consensus from the literature indicates that both techniques have their merits, but the superiority of mechanical CPR devices over manual compression remains contentious.

Several studies demonstrate that mechanical CPR devices, such as the LUCAS or AutoPulse systems, excel in delivering consistent and uninterrupted chest compressions, which is critical in maintaining cerebral and coronary perfusion during resuscitation. Research conducted by Ong et al. found that mechanical CPR resulted in significantly higher rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) compared to manual CPR, observing ROSC in 34.5% of cases with mechanical devices versus 20.2% in manual cases (Ong et al., 2012). This finding is supported by Westfall et al., who noted that mechanical compression devices improve ROSC by over 1.6 times compared to manual compressions (Westfall et al., 2013).

Nonetheless, a substantial body of evidence questions the overall clinical benefits of mechanical CPR regarding long-term survival and neurological outcomes. Studies have shown that while mechanical devices may achieve a higher ROSC rate, they do not necessarily translate to improved survival to hospital discharge or favorable neurological recovery. For instance, a systematic review by Wang and Brooks highlighted that mechanical CPR does not demonstrate superior effectiveness in improving patient outcomes compared to manual CPR (Wang & Brooks, 2018). Similarly, Li et al. observed that mechanical chest compressions did not significantly improve outcomes compared to manual techniques (Li et al., 2016). But in the studies, it was not apparent whether the medical care and interventions provided were accurate or fully implemented per the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation recommendations, additionally, there was no indication of whether the devices were placed in a 10 second timeframe, or perhaps took longer to place, thereby affecting outcome.

Moreover, the type of arrest rhythm appears to influence the efficacy of each method. Specifically, Chiang et al. found that mechanical devices were particularly beneficial in scenarios involving non-shockable rhythms, reflecting an enhanced role for these devices in certain clinical contexts (Chiang et al., 2022). However, during scenarios with shockable rhythms, the advantages of mechanical CPR diminished, perhaps due to a significant volume of shockable rhythms resolving on the first or second defibrillation.

Concerns regarding safety and potential complications stemming from mechanical CPR devices have also been noted in the literature. Devices may introduce risks such as rib fractures or pneumothorax, which should be weighed against their possible benefits (Kim et al., 2019). Importantly, studies have revealed adverse neurological outcomes in patients treated with mechanical CPR, raising questions about the overall safety and efficiency of these devices in real-world applications (Couper et al., 2016). Safety questions may also not be clear as to the rate of complications stemming from manual CPR, or the rate of complication due to improper use of the mechanical CPR device.

In conclusion, while mechanical CPR offers distinct advantages, particularly in maintaining compressions during transport or in challenging environments, the prevailing evidence does not establish it as unequivocally more effective than manual CPR across all patient populations and circumstances. Future research is imperative to delineate the contexts in which mechanical CPR may provide robust advantages and to establish protocols that optimize the integration of these devices into standard resuscitation practices, as well as speed of application.

REFERENCES:
Chiang, C., Lim, K., Lai, P., Tsai, T., Huang, Y., & Tsai, M. (2022). Comparison between prehospital mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (cpr) devices and manual cpr for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(5), 1448.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051448
Couper, K., Yeung, J., Nicholson, T., Quinn, T., Lall, R., & Perkins, G. (2016). Mechanical chest compression devices at in-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation, 103, 24-31.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.03.004
Kim, H., Kim, J., Jang, Y., Kang, G., Kim, W., Choi, H., … & Jun, G. (2019). Comparison of in-hospital use of mechanical chest compression devices for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Medicine, 98(45), e17881.
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000017881
Li, H., Wang, D., Yu, Y., Zhao, X., & Jing, X. (2016). Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 24(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0202-y
Ong, M., Mackey, K., Zhang, Z., Tanaka, H., Huei‐Ming, M., Swor, R., … & Shin, S. (2012). Mechanical cpr devices compared to manual cpr during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and ambulance transport: a systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 20(1), 39.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-20-39
Wang, P. and Brooks, S. (2018). Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd007260.pub4
Westfall, M., Krantz, S., Mullin, C., & Kaufman, C. (2013). Mechanical versus manual chest compressions in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Critical Care Medicine, 41(7), 1782-1789.
https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e31828a24e3

KETAMINE AS A DISSOCIATIVE AGENT IN NON-INVASIVE VENTILATION (NIV)v– Michael Christiehttps://www.gemr.org/blog/34/ketami...
11/14/2025

KETAMINE AS A DISSOCIATIVE AGENT IN NON-INVASIVE VENTILATION (NIV)v– Michael Christie

https://www.gemr.org/blog/34/ketamine-as-a-dissociative-agent-in-non-invasive-ventilation-niv/

In recent years, ketamine has been recognized as a notable dissociative agent in the context of non-invasive ventilation (NIV), particularly for patients facing respiratory distress. Its unique pharmacological profile, which includes effective analgesic and sedative properties, renders it beneficial for patients in need of mechanical support or those at risk for intubation due to inadequate respiratory function. Studies highlight ketamine's role in reducing ventilator-induced dyssynchrony (VPD), which can be especially problematic in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (Wyler et al., 2023).

As a versatile anesthetic, ketamine not only deepens sedation but also serves as a valuable adjunct in analgo-sedation protocols, particularly minimizing the use of opioids and benzodiazepines (Wyler et al., 2023; Verma et al., 2019). The bronchodilator effects of ketamine further support its use in patients with respiratory compromise, including those suffering from severe asthma exacerbations (Shlamovitz & Hawthorne, 2011). Experimental and clinical evidence suggests that ketamine can relax bronchial smooth muscle, thereby improving ventilation parameters such as PaO2 and mean airway pressure, which are critical in NIV settings (Shlamovitz & Hawthorne, 2011). Moreover, its sedative efficacy can help facilitate the patient-ventilator interface during NIV, making it an attractive option in cases of decompensated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and acute heart failure (Verma et al., 2019; Bradshaw et al., 2019).

A study demonstrated that continuous ketamine infusion can effectively reduce the consumption of other sedatives while ensuring adequate sedation in critically ill patients (Buchheit et al., 2017). Furthermore, its use has been documented alongside dexmedetomidine, maximizing sedation while minimizing respiratory depression, a common concern in patients with compromised pulmonary function (Riccardi et al., 2023). The sedative doses typically range from low to moderate, which helps in achieving desired outcomes without the associated risks tied to traditional sedatives like benzodiazepines, which have significant side effects including delirium and prolonged mechanical ventilation (Haliloğlu, 2022).

Nevertheless, the risk of cholestatic liver injury associated with prolonged ketamine infusion in critically ill COVID-19 patients raises concerns about its long-term usage (Wendel‐Garcia et al., 2022). Despite these apprehensions, ketamine's application in acute settings—especially as a temporizing measure to avoid mechanical ventilation—continues to show promise (Shlamovitz & Hawthorne, 2011; Verma et al., 2019; . Clinical observations and trials emphasize that ketamine supports patient comfort during NIV and enhances overall tolerance, leading to better outcomes in respiratory management (Ghazaly et al., 2024; Verma et al., 2019; Bradshaw et al., 2019).

In conclusion, ketamine's multifaceted role as a dissociative anesthetic in non-invasive ventilation is evidenced by its analgesic, bronchodilatory, and sedative properties, making it an essential tool in critical care medicine for various patient populations. A thoughtful balance between its advantages and potential adverse effects is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes in respiratory emergencies.

REFERENCES:
Bradshaw, P., Droege, C., Carter, K., Harger, N., & Mueller, E. (2019). Continuous infusion ketamine for adjunctive analgosedation in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients. Pharmacotherapy the Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, 39(3), 288-296.
https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.2223
Buchheit, J., Yeh, D., Eikermann, M., & Lin, H. (2017). Impact of low-dose ketamine on the usage of continuous opioid infusion for the treatment of pain in adult mechanically ventilated patients in surgical intensive care units. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, 34(8), 646-651.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066617706907
Ghazaly, H., Elansary, M., Mahmoud, A., Hasanen, M., & Hassan, M. (2024). Dexmedetomidine versus ketamine in improving tolerance to noninvasive ventilation after blunt chest trauma: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology, 40(4), 619-625.
https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_145_23
Haliloğlu, M. (2022). Continuous infusion of ketamine for adjunctive analgosedation in mechanically ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology.
https://doi.org/10.14744/ejp.2022.3005
Riccardi, A., Serra, S., Iaco, F., Fabbri, A., Shiffer, D., & Voza, A. (2023). Uncovering the benefits of the ketamine–dexmedetomidine combination for procedural sedation during the italian covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(9), 3124.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12093124
Shlamovitz, G. and Hawthorne, T. (2011). Intravenous ketamine in a dissociating dose as a temporizing measure to avoid mechanical ventilation in adult patient with severe asthma exacerbation. Journal of Emergency Medicine, 41(5), 492-494.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.03.035
Verma, A., Snehy, A., Vishen, A., Sheikh, W., Haldar, M., & Jaiswal, S. (2019). Ketamine use allows noninvasive ventilation in distressed patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 23(4), 191-192.
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23153
Wendel‐Garcia, P., Erlebach, R., Hofmaenner, D., Camen, G., Schuepbach, R., Jüngst, C., … & David, S. (2022). Long-term ketamine infusion-induced cholestatic liver injury in covid-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome. Critical Care, 26(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04019-8
Wyler, D., Torjman, M., Leong, R., Baram, M., Denk, W., Long, S., … & Schwenk, E. (2023). Observational study of the effect of ketamine infusions on sedation depth, inflammation, and clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients with sars-cov-2. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 52(2), 105-112.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x231201184

In recent years, ketamine has been recognized as a notable dissociative agent in the context of non-invasive ventilation (NIV), particularly for patients facing respiratory distress. Its unique pharmacological profile, which includes effective analgesic and sedative properties, renders it beneficial...

11/01/2025

INSTRUCTOR LED SIMULATION IS VITAL FOR IMPROVED OUTCOMES IN RESUSCITATION TRAINING – Michael Christie

https://www.gemr.org/blog/33/instructor-led-simulation-is-vital-for-improved-outcomes-in-resuscitation-training/

The effectiveness of instructor-led simulation in resuscitation training is well documented and supported by a growing body of evidence demonstrating significant improvements in both knowledge and skill retention among healthcare providers.

Simulations provide a realistic environment that fosters the practice of critical skills in a controlled setting, allowing for repeated exposure to emergencies that are rarely encountered in everyday clinical practice. This aligns with findings from Mccoy et al., who assert that simulation training yields better adherence to American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines among medical students learning cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) compared to standard training methods (McCoy et al., 2018).

Furthermore, studies indicate that the integration of simulation training significantly enhances the competencies of healthcare professionals delivering critical care. For example, Ouseph et al. emphasize that simulation training is considered a cornerstone for educating medical professionals in resuscitation techniques, as recognized by the AHA (Ouseph et al., 2015). This sentiment is echoed by Sawyer et al., who conclude that simulation-based education is not only effective in enhancing immediate performance but also critical for long-term retention of procedural knowledge and skills in neonatal resuscitation (Sawyer et al., 2016).

Moreover, the application of high-fidelity simulations has been shown to markedly improve performance in resuscitation tasks, as indicated by the systematic review conducted by Huang et al., which highlights the positive impact of such training on neonatal resuscitation outcomes (Huang et al., 2019). In a similar vein, Garvey and Dempsey point to the reduction in mortality rates through simulation programs in both developed and developing countries, demonstrating the effectiveness of these training methods (Garvey & Dempsey, 2020).

The benefits of simulation extend beyond individual skill enhancement; they also foster team dynamics crucial during resuscitation scenarios. Research by Farhadi et al. shows that team-based simulation training enhances collaborative skills among healthcare teams, facilitating more effective resuscitation efforts (Farhadi et al., 2023). Such collaborative approaches, as Palmer et al. note, ensure that nursing activities align with the timing and coordination required in high-stakes environments, thereby supporting the premise that simulation training is vital for improving clinical outcomes in neonatal resuscitation (Palmer et al., 2019).

In summary, instructor-led simulation training serves as a critical method for advancing resuscitation training. The consensus in literature reinforces its role in optimizing both individual competencies and team performance, which collectively lead to improved patient outcomes. It is imperative that institutions continue to incorporate simulation into their training curricula to sustain and advance the quality of healthcare delivery.

REFERENCES:
Farhadi, R., Azandehi, B., Amuei, F., Ahmadi, M., Zazoly, A., & Ghorbani, A. (2023). Enhancing residents’ neonatal resuscitation competency through team-based simulation training: an intervention educational study. BMC Medical Education, 23(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04704-4
Garvey, A. and Dempsey, E. (2020). Simulation in neonatal resuscitation. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 8.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.00059
Huang, J., Tang, Y., Tang, J., Shi, J., Wang, H., Xiong, T., … & Mu, D. (2019). Educational efficacy of high-fidelity simulation in neonatal resuscitation training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education, 19(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1763-z
McCoy, E., Rahman, A., Rendon, J., Anderson, C., Langdorf, M., Lotfipour, S., … & Chakravarthy, B. (2018). Randomized controlled trial of simulation vs. standard training for teaching medical students high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 20(1), 15-22.
https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2018.11.39040
Ouseph, B., Mohidin, S., Tabsh, L., & Al‐Hebshi, A. (2015). Nurses' resuscitation performance: study on the effectiveness of training and support at a teaching hospital in ksa. International Journal of Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease, 3(4), 21-27.
https://doi.org/10.13189/ijccd.2015.030401
Palmer, E., Labant, A., Edwards, T., & Boothby, J. (2019). A collaborative partnership for improving newborn safety: using simulation for neonatal resuscitation training. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 50(7), 319-324.
https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20190612-07
Sawyer, T., Ades, A., Ernst, K., & Colby, C. (2016). Simulation and the neonatal resuscitation program 7th edition curriculum. Neoreviews, 17(8), e447-e453.
https://doi.org/10.1542/neo.17-8-e447

10/18/2025

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF SYNCOPE
– Michael Christie

https://www.gemr.org/blog/32/recommendations-for-the-management-of-syncope/

In 2025, advancements in the management and treatment of syncope will be crucial, continuing to evolve based on both clinical findings and updated guidelines. A holistic approach is necessary, considering various forms of syncope, including reflex, arrhythmic, and orthostatic causes, while emphasizing risk stratification, lifestyle modifications, and patient education.

The treatment of reflex syncope, such as vasovagal syncope, remains fundamentally directed towards avoidance of known triggers and enhancements in fluid and salt intake. Studies have shown that educating patients about their condition, along with prescribed interventions that include physical counter-pressure maneuvers and tilt training, can effectively prevent syncopal events and improve quality of life (Ahmadi et al., 2024; (Wen et al., 2020; Loughlin et al., 2020). Increased salt intake has been recognized as an important recommendation in several clinical management protocols, contributing to blood volume expansion and thus aiding symptom management (Wen et al., 2020; Loughlin et al., 2020).

In cases of high-risk syncope, particularly with significant cardiac etiology, an expedited evaluation is critical. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) emphasizes that individuals exhibiting alarming clinical features should undergo an early intensive assessment, typically in specialized syncope units or observation units (Reed et al., 2023; (Ghariq et al., 2023; . Current guidelines further recommend that patients with unexplained syncope or those presenting with dangerous arrhythmic profiles should be monitored closely and may require the fitting of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) (Shabbir et al., 2022; Francisco‐Pascual et al., 2023). For patients with cardioinhibitory syncope caused by vagal mechanisms, pacing strategies, including the use of leadless devices, can provide effective management solutions (Brieger et al., 2024; Francisco‐Pascual et al., 2023).

Educational initiatives are vital for improving adherence to syncope management guidelines, as highlighted by studies focusing on enhancing healthcare providers' understanding of syncope diagnostics (Ghariq et al., 2023; Ghariq et al., 2021). Incorporating multidisciplinary approaches and standardized clinical pathways is essential to ensure appropriate care, reducing unnecessary testing and hospitalizations, which burden the healthcare system and compromise patient experience (Amin et al., 2021).

Furthermore, there is a growing interest in technological advancements, particularly artificial intelligence, that can enhance diagnostic accuracy and streamline syncope management workflows. AI tools are being explored to refine clinical decision-making processes, which may prove integral as the field advances (Amin et al., 2021; Johnston, 2025).

In essence, the recommended strategies for syncope management center on thorough diagnostic evaluations, tailored treatment plans based on syncope types, increased patient involvement through education, and the integration of innovative technologies to support clinical practices.

REFERENCES:
Ahmadi, A., Sabri, M., Navabi, Z., Dehghan, B., Taheri, M., & Mahdavi, C. (2024). The impact of self-care recommendations with and without tilt-training on quality of life in children and adolescents with vasovagal syncope: a randomized clinical trial. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 29(3), 358-367.
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_137_23
Amin, S., Gupta, V., Du, G., McMullen, C., Sirrine, M., Williams, M., … & Li, J. (2021). Developing and demonstrating the viability and availability of the multilevel implementation strategy for syncope optimal care through engagement (mission) syncope app: evidence-based clinical decision support tool. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(11), e25192.
https://doi.org/10.2196/25192
Brieger, D., Tofler, G., & Chia, K. (2024). Use of a leadless pacemaker in the management of swallow syncope: a case report. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 47(8), 1061-1064.
https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.14923
Francisco‐Pascual, J., Jordán, P., Silva, J., & Rivas-Gándara, N. (2023). Arrhythmic syncope: from diagnosis to management. World Journal of Cardiology, 15(4), 119-141.
https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v15.i4.119
Ghariq, M., Bodegom‐Vos, L., Brignole, M., Peeters, S., Groot, B., Kaal, E., … & Thijs, R. (2021). Factors facilitating and hindering the implementation of the european society of cardiology syncope guidelines at the emergency department: a nationwide qualitative study. International Journal of Cardiology, 333, 167-173.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.02.067
Ghariq, M., Hout, W., Dekkers, O., Bootsma, M., Groot, B., Groothuis, J., … & Fokke, C. (2023). Diagnostic and societal impact of implementing the syncope guidelines of the european society of cardiology (synergy study). BMC Medicine, 21(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-03056-6
Johnston, S. (2025). The hope and the hype of artificial intelligence for syncope management. European Heart Journal - Digital Health, 6(5), 1046-1054.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf061
Loughlin, E., Judge, C., Gorey, S., Costello, M., Murphy, R., Waters, R., … & Canavan, M. (2020). Increased salt intake for orthostatic intolerance syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The American Journal of Medicine, 133(12), 1471-1478.e4.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.05.028
Reed, M., Karuranga, S., Kearns, D., Alawiye, S., Clarke, B., Möckel, M., … & Laribi, S. (2023). Management of syncope in the emergency department: a european prospective cohort study (seed). European Journal of Emergency Medicine, 31(2), 136-146.
https://doi.org/10.1097/mej.0000000000001101
Shabbir, M., Shaukat, M., Ehtesham, M., Murawski, S., Singh, S., & Alimohammad, R. (2022). Bifascicular block in unexplained syncope is underrecognized and under-evaluated: a single-center audit of esc guidelines adherence. Plos One, 17(2), e0263727.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263727
Wen, C., Wang, S., Zou, R., Wang, Y., Tan, C., Xu, Y., … & Wang, C. (2020). Duration of treatment with oral rehydration salts for vasovagal syncope in children and adolescents. The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics, 62(5), 820-825.
https://doi.org/10.24953/turkjped.2020.05.014

Address

9208 NE Highway 99 Ste 107/343
Vancouver, WA
98665

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Global Emergency Medical Registry posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Global Emergency Medical Registry:

Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest Share on Reddit Share via Email
Share on WhatsApp Share on Instagram Share on Telegram

Category

Global Emergency Medical Registry (GEMR)

The Global Registry originally formed in January 2004 in an effort to standardize professional industry medical technicians across several continents. This effort was recognized by Association of Accredited Certification Bodies (http://aacb.com.au/) for demonstrating a commitment to abiding by the legal and ethical requirements of the AACB board and the greater international medical community.

Credentialing by AACB also works to protect the public by assuring consumers that professionals have met standards of practice and advances the profession through standards of professional knowledge, skills, and practices

In 2017, the international standards for Emergency Medical Service providers were updated and began implementation in many parts of the world. The Registry, responding to our accreditation mandates internationally, began a corporate restructuring to meet these new requirements and demonstrate compliance with these new standards.

The Registry came to the realization, in working with various stakeholders and countries around the world, that an international third-party competency confirmation process was necessary to move forward the goals of competency improvement in the prehospital and hospital occupational categories worldwide. This effort became the Global Emergency Medical Registry – GEMR.