02/27/2026
“Ethics often confronts us with tensions between competing duties, where every available course of action violates some core principle.” In a new article, International Transactional Analysis Association (ITAA) President Marguerite Sacco uses this statement to frame a profound dilemma: Should the organization comment on global atrocities and political crises?
According to the author, speaking out aligns with the value to resist oppression, but it also risks alienating members with differing views on complex conflicts. Sacco explains that remaining silent can feel like tacit acceptance, yet issuing general condemnations of violence can seem shallow and morally inadequate.
This is not a dilemma for the board to solve alone. The article’s author has issued a direct call to the community for guidance on how the ITAA can navigate this ethical challenge transparently and with integrity. Read her full analysis and share your perspective on a way forward.
Access this and other content directly at https://www.platform.itaaworld.com. Or access the link lists available on our digital networks.
https://platform.itaaworld.com/news/to-speak-out-or-remain-silent-the-ethical-dilemma-facing-the-itaa
An analysis of the ITAA's challenge: how to respond to global atrocities without fracturing the community. Explore the tension between moral duty and survival.