02/20/2026
Email from one of my fuctional medicine instructors, and I agree 100% âŹď¸âŹď¸
"Functional medicine is pseudoscience."
That's the excuse lazy practitioners use to avoid accountability.
They dismiss functional ranges while using conventional ranges that were derived from a chronically sick population.
They call nutritional intervention "unproven" âŚ
While prescribing medications that manage symptoms without ever asking why the symptoms are there.
They mock preventative health âŚ
While seeing the same patients return every 8 weeks with the same complaints and the same prescriptions.
And they feel justified âŚ
Because they have a degree on the wall and a system behind them that rewards treatment over prevention.
But here's what they won't tell you.
Their degree taught them to identify disease.
It didn't teach them to identify dysfunction.
It taught them when to prescribe.
Not when to intervene before the prescription becomes necessary.
It taught them how to read a panel against ranges that tolerate illness
⌠not ranges that define health.
And the idea that education ends at graduation?
That's not confidence.
That's arrogance dressed as authority.
Functional blood work isn't the rejection of conventional medicine.
It's the extension of it.
It asks the question conventional training never did: what's happening between "you're fine" and "you're sick"?
Every biomarker taught is found in peer-reviewed literature.
Every range we use is derived from evidence-based research.
Every framework we have built on published science, not ideology.
The practitioners who call it pseudoscience haven't read the research.
They've just decided they don't need to.