06/26/2025
RFK Jr. just proposed that every American use wearable health tech within the next 4 years. I get it—nobody wants their personal info handed over to the government, and plenty of folks already think RFK Jr. is unqualified. But let’s look at the bigger picture.
In medicine, self-monitoring is already the norm:
Diabetics check their sugars daily to adjust insulin.
Asthmatics use peak flow meters to manage inhalers.
CHF patients weigh themselves to watch for fluid retention.
Hypertensive patients monitor their blood pressure.
And we’re all buried in “quality measures” to improve outcomes.
So why the pushback on tracking steps, calories, and macros? Honestly, these are probably BETTER metrics to focus on than just prescribing more meds. Empowering people to move more and eat better could have a bigger impact on long-term health than any pill.
Imagine if, instead of only reacting to disease, we actually encouraged and measured healthy habits—walking more, eating smarter, and understanding what we put in our bodies. If physicians and patients could work together to set and track real goals, we might see fewer prescriptions and more genuine wellness.
The real concern is privacy and trust. I agree: data should be private, and participation should be voluntary. No one wants Big Brother watching their every step. But let’s not throw out the idea just because of “what ifs.” Wearables, when used right, can empower us—not control us.
Bottom line: Tracking steps and nutrition isn’t about surveillance; it’s about giving people tools to take charge of their health. If we want better outcomes, let’s focus on what really matters—healthy habits, not just more medications.
What do you think? Would you use a wearable if it meant less medication and more control over your health? Or is this a step too far? Let’s talk!
