05/15/2020
You know medicine is getting desperate when the FDA approves medications where rare infections and even DEATH are common enough to be listed among the side effects.
How blurry can the line between "do no harm" and "acceptable risk" get?
☯️
Within the body of 中醫/Traditional Chinese Medicine, I have yet to encounter a reference to a medical intervention where death was an acceptable side effect. On the contrary, there are numerous references to iatrogenic disease (disease caused by the doctor's treatment).
☯️
The 道德經/Dào Dé Jīng says, "太上,不知有之/the greatest is that which goes unknown." When applied to medicine, this means side effects constitute a gross failing on behalf of the doctor. This is, in part, why Chinese medicine utilizes a holistic model and prefers to use medicinal formulas over single herbs. A comprehensive medical history plus medicine that repairs multiple stages of the patient's metabolism significantly reduces the risk of adverse reactions.
☯️
Ultimately, there are no "side effects." There are only effects. Don't you think medicine should be judged by how well she/he can avoid them?
☯️