01/15/2026
New year, new edition of ‘Feed’ will be featured here on IG, highlighting oral history interviews conducted by Cassie Packard, , an art writer and editor at . Eyebeam looks at four artists whose emergent explorations address the issues and ideas most critical to building the futures we seek. In the artist’s examinations of technologies and their near-compulsory and exploitative integration into every facet of our lives, they scrutinize the altered conditions of our relationships with ourselves, our (digital and natural) ecosystems, and each other. 🔗Links in bio!🔗
Riar Rizaldi, →
“exploring how technology is understood by people who live in a humid, tropical area that is, on one hand, a dumping ground for electronic waste, and on the other, a center for natural resources like tin that are used to manufacture those same objects.”
•
Constant Dullaart, →
“Reality can be an oppressive construct; to be challenged at all times. Art can prompt you to see differently and shift your perspective. Artists can dream up incorrect, weird, non-efficient, non-solutionary uses of technology and different modes of using technology that don’t involve the outrageous data mining that we’ve become accustomed to.”
•
Xin Xin, →
“Being an artist is akin to asking questions that nobody really has answers to, prototyping from that, and—hopefully—stimulating new thoughts, new ideas, or new ways forward. It’s kind of like putting a ball in the world and seeing, does anyone catch it? How is it caught, and what happens next?”
•
Paribartana Mohanty, →
“In the socioeconomic background I come from, the question of ‘technology’ boils down to ecosystems of access and freedom, which relate to factors like class and caste. First, you enable access, which allows for scope; then there’s the possibility of expanding the technology from a human perspective.”
ID of artists in alt-text and captions in the comments.